<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>User-Agent on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/user-agent/</link><description>Recent content in User-Agent on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.167.0</generator><language>es</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:09:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/user-agent/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>History of the browser user-agent string</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/07/17/history-of-the-browser-user-agent-string/</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:09:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/07/17/history-of-the-browser-user-agent-string/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the beginning there was NCSA Mosaic, and Mosaic called itself
NCSA_Mosaic/2.0 (Windows 3.1), and Mosaic displayed pictures along
with text, and there was much rejoicing.
And behold, then came a new web browser known as ”Mozilla”, being
short for ”Mosaic Killer,” but Mosaic was not amused, so the public
name was changed to Netscape, and Netscape called itself Mozilla/1.0
(Win3.1), and there was more rejoicing. And Netscape supported frames,
and frames became popular among the people, but Mosaic did not support
frames, and so came ”user agent sniffing” and to ”Mozilla” webmasters
sent frames, but to other browsers they sent not frames.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>