<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Typography on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/typography/</link><description>Recent content in Typography on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.167.0</generator><language>es</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 22:45:17 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/typography/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Cursiva, Negrita y Comillas</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2022/02/27/cursiva-negrita-y-comillas/</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 22:45:17 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2022/02/27/cursiva-negrita-y-comillas/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hola, hablante, comparto aquí contigo la introducción al curso Cursiva,
Negrita y Comillas, que impartí para un grupo de estudiantes de los
Cursos del Blog de Lengua. Te doy la bienvenida a esta…&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;» &lt;a href="https://www.facebook.com/alberto.bustos"&gt;https://www.facebook.com/alberto.bustos&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="https://blog.lengua-e.com/2022/cursiva-negrita-y-comillas/"&gt;blog.lengua-e.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Which Are More Legible: Serif or Sans Serif Typefaces?</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/08/27/which-are-more-legible-serif-or-sans-serif-typefaces/</link><pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 21:12:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/08/27/which-are-more-legible-serif-or-sans-serif-typefaces/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Back in 1998 when Times New Roman was still widely used on the web, my
then boss made sure we always designed our web sites with Arial, as
she hated the look of serif fonts on the web. Was it the case that
sans serif fonts were more legible, or was it just a matter of taste?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 2003 as part of my master’s degree I reviewed over 50 empirical
studies in typography and found a definitive answer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An argument has been raging for decades within the scientific and
typographic communities on what seems a very insignificant issue: Do
serifs contribute to the legibility of typefaces, and by definition,
are sans serif typefaces less legible? To date, no one has managed to
provide a conclusive answer to this issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>Applying Macrotypography For A More Readable Web Page</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/28/applying-macrotypography-for-a-more-readable-web-page/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2012 01:32:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/28/applying-macrotypography-for-a-more-readable-web-page/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any application of typography can be divided into two arenas: micro
and macro. Understanding the difference between the two is especially
useful when crafting a reading experience, because it allows the
designer to know when to focus on legibility and when to focus on
readability.
This article focuses mostly on a few simple macrotypographic
techniques”with a dash of micro”and on how to combine them all to
build a more harmonious, adaptable and, most importantly, readable Web
page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Art of Computer Typography</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/26/the-art-of-computer-typography/</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 11:24:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/26/the-art-of-computer-typography/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ever since I came across Jürg Lehni’s essay on typographic technology
and digital fonts, Typeface As Programme, I’ve been fascinated with
the story of Donald E. Knuth and his unexpected contributions to
typography.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;» @Jason Z. | &lt;a href="https://37signals.com/svn/posts/3183-the-art-of-computer-typography"&gt;37signals.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Dario Taraborelli: The Beauty of LaTeX</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/16/dario-taraborelli-the-beauty-of-latex/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 23:50:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/05/16/dario-taraborelli-the-beauty-of-latex/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are several reasons why one should prefer LaTeX to a WYSIWYG
word processor like Microsoft Word: portability, lightness, security
are just a few of them (not to mention that LaTeX is free). There is
still a further reason that definitely convinced me to abandon MS Word
when I wrote my dissertation: you will never be able to produce
professionally typeset and well-structured documents using most
WYSIWYG word processors. LaTeX is a free typesetting system that
allows you to focus on content without bothering about the layout: the
software takes care of the actual typesetting, structuring and page
formatting, producing documents of astonishing elegance.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>