<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Freedom on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/freedom/</link><description>Recent content in Freedom on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.167.0</generator><language>es</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:03:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/freedom/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>The coming war on general-purpose computing</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2015/02/23/the-coming-war-on-general-purpose-computing/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:03:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2015/02/23/the-coming-war-on-general-purpose-computing/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Enter Digital Rights Management in its most primitive forms: let’s
call it DRM 0.96. They introduced physical indicia which the software
checked for—deliberate damage, dongles, hidden sectors—and
challenge-response protocols that required possession of large,
unwieldy manuals that were difficult to copy. These failed for two
reasons. First, they were commercially unpopular, because they reduced
the usefulness of the software to the legitimate purchasers. Honest
buyers resented the non-functionality of their backups, they hated the
loss of scarce ports to the authentication dongles, and they chafed at
the inconvenience of having to lug around large manuals when they
wanted to run their software. Second, these didn’t stop pirates, who
found it trivial to patch the software and bypass authentication.
People who took the software without paying for it were untouched.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>