<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Academia on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/academia/</link><description>Recent content in Academia on Karpoke - Just Another Blog</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.167.0</generator><language>es</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:48:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/tags/academia/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Hacking Academia: Data Science and the University</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2014/09/21/hacking-academia-data-science-and-the-university/</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2014 14:48:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2014/09/21/hacking-academia-data-science-and-the-university/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The problem we discussed is laid out in some detail in my Brain Drain
post, but a quick summary is this: scientific research in many
disciplines is becoming more and more dependent on the careful
analysis of large datasets. This analysis requires a skill-set as
broad as it is deep: scientists must be experts not only in their own
domain, but in statistics, computing, algorithm building, and software
design as well. Many researchers are working hard to attain these
skills; the problem is that academia’s reward structure is not
well-poised to reward the value of this type of work. In short, time
spent developing high-quality reusable software tools translates to
less time writing and publishing, which under the current system
translates to little hope for academic career advancement. » Jake
Vanderplas | &lt;a href="http://jakevdp.github.io/blog/2013/10/26/big-data-brain-drain/"&gt;The Big Data Brain Drain: Why Science is in Trouble&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item><item><title>Best Paper Awards in Computer Science (since 1996)</title><link>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/08/15/best-paper-awards-in-computer-science-since-1996/</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2012 17:30:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>http://karpoke.ignaciocano.com/2012/08/15/best-paper-awards-in-computer-science-since-1996/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much of this data was entered by hand (obtained by contacting past
conference organizers, retrieving cached conference websites, and
searching CVs) so please email me if you notice any errors or
omissions: bestpaper-AT-jeffhuang.com. I tried to collect best paper
awards from the top-tier conferences in each area, but some
conferences do not have such an award (e.g. SIGGRAPH, CAV).
”Distinguished paper award” and ”outstanding paper award” are included
but not ”best student paper” (e.g. NIPS) or ”best 10-year old paper”
(e.g. POPL)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>